Skip to content

Home / Resources / The Bible Is Better Than Hearing God Speak Audibly

The Bible Is Better Than Hearing God Speak Audibly

Written by Mark Vroegop on

For we did not follow cleverly devised myths when we made known to you the power and coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, but we were eyewitnesses of his majesty. For when he received honor and glory from God the Father, and the voice was borne to him by the Majestic Glory, โ€œThis is my beloved Son, with whom I am well pleased,โ€ we ourselves heard this very voice borne from heaven, for we were with him on the holy mountain. And we have the prophetic word more fully confirmed, to which you will do well to pay attention as to a lamp shining in a dark place, until the day dawns and the morning star rises in your hearts, knowing this first of all, that no prophecy of Scripture comes from someoneโ€™s own interpretation. For no prophecy was ever produced by the will of man, but men spoke from God as they were carried along by the Holy Spirit
(2 Pet. 1:16-21).

Taken from the sermon โ€œReasons We Donโ€™t Believe: The Bible Isnโ€™t Trustworthyโ€ by Mark Vroegop. Read article 1 of the series.

In Peterโ€™s second argument for the trustworthiness of Godโ€™s Word, he uses his own experience as the backdrop for a critical comparison between God speaking audibly and the Scriptures themselves.

Peter was an eyewitness to the majesty of Christ. There was a moment when the veil of Jesusโ€™s humanity was lifted. Peter, James, and John saw Jesus as the Son of God. His humanity was eclipsed by his glory. This event is called the transfiguration.

Mark 9 is one place where this is recorded:

And after six days Jesus took with him Peter and James and John, and led them up a high mountain by themselves. And he was transfigured before them, and his clothes became radiant, intensely white, as no one on earth could bleach them. And there appeared to them Elijah with Moses, and they were talking with Jesus. And Peter said to Jesus, โ€œRabbi, it is good that we are here. Let us make three tents, one for you and one for Moses and one for Elijah.โ€ For he did not know what to say, for they were terrified. And a cloud overshadowed them, and a voice came out of the cloud, โ€œThis is my beloved Son; listen to himโ€ (Mark 9:2-7).

What moment could have been better than this? What combination of seeing the glory of Christ, meeting with Elijah and Moses, and hearing the Fatherโ€™s affirmation of his Son could have been more powerful? It is hard to imagine anything that could more fully validate who Jesus was.

Peter saw with his eyes. He heard the voice of God speak. Peter is writing from a historical vantage point of someone who was there on the mountain (2 Pet. 1:18). During his lifetime, skeptics could have asked real people like James and John if the transfiguration really happened. If the record of the Bible wasnโ€™t true, it wouldnโ€™t name so many people with whom others could have fact-checked the story.

He provides this level of detail, not for the purpose of validating the Bible, but rather, as  a set up for another point. He desires for you to be in awe of his personal and historical experience as an eyewitness. However, the punch line is in 2 Peter 1:19:

And we have the prophetic word more fully confirmed, to which you will do well to pay attention as to a lamp shining in a dark place, until the day dawns and the morning star rises in your hearts . . . (2 Pet. 1:19).

What does this mean?

By prophetic word, Peter is referring to what was previously written about Jesus, and by implication, all of Scripture. He uses the word, or something similar to it, in verse 19 (โ€œprophetic wordโ€), verse 20 (โ€œprophecy of Scriptureโ€), and in verse 21 (โ€œprophecyโ€). This word does not just mean things that are predicted by the Bible. The phrase โ€œprophetic wordโ€ combined with โ€œprophecy of Scriptureโ€ point us to the written word.

But then he says something stunning! This prophetic word is โ€œmore fully confirmedโ€ (v. 19). The NASB renders this as โ€œmade more sureโ€ and the NIV as โ€œsomething completely reliable.โ€ He simply says that his eyewitness testimony only confirmed what was already trueโ€”the prophetic word, the Word of God. Peterโ€™s personal experience wasnโ€™t more reliable than the Scriptures themselves; his experience served to confirm the trustworthiness of the Scriptures.

This is important because it determines how you view the Bible. There are some of you who might be tempted to think, โ€œIf I saw it with my own eyes, it would be much easier to believe.โ€ Others might be tempted to say, โ€œI really canโ€™t believe without seeing it for myself.โ€

In the parable of the rich man and Lazarus, the rich man asks Abraham to send Lazarus back from the dead to warn his family about their eternal jeopardy. But in the parable, Abraham says something very instructive:

But Abraham said, โ€œThey have Moses and the Prophets; let them hear them.โ€ And he said, โ€œNo, father Abraham, but if someone goes to them from the dead, they will repentโ€โ€™ He said to him, โ€œIf they do not hear Moses and the Prophets, neither will they be convinced if someone should rise from the deadโ€ (Luke 16:29-31).

Hardness of heart against the Word of God is not cured by a miraculous sign. The Scriptures themselves are sufficient. They are more trustworthy than a voice from heaven or someone returning from the dead. One commentator says it this way, as if he were speaking for Peter:

Listen to meโ€”I was an eyewitness to the saving acts of God in history. And I know that after Christโ€™s death and resurrection God will have no need to ever again perform these things in the presence of another generation. But remember, this in no way means that your faith is inferior to mine (1:1). We have both been given the prophetic promises of God. We can all read the words written down long ago. They are a more sure light than anything I ever saw and heard. Beloved, my seeing these things is important. Witnesses are essential. But God does not need to appear in the flesh every forty or fifty years to enlighten us and confirm his love to us. Seeing isnโ€™t essential for believingโ€”reading Godโ€™s word is.[1]

The Bible is more certain than if we heard God audibly. The Bible is God speaking. It is the Word of God.

Listen to the full sermon โ€œReasons We Donโ€™t Believe: The Bible Isnโ€™t Trustworthy.โ€


[1] David Helm, 1-2 Peter and Jude โ€“ Sharing in Christโ€™s Sufferings. (Wheaton: Crossway, 2008), 216.


Mark Vroegop

Mark Vroegop (BA, Cedarville University; MDiv, Cornerstone Seminary) is the president of The Gospel Coalition. He served in pastoral ministry leadership for nearly 30 years, most recently as the lead pastor of College Park Church in Indianapolis. An award-winning author, Mark has written several books, including Dark Clouds, Deep Mercy: Discovering the Grace of Lamentย and Waiting Isnโ€™t a Waste: The Surprising Comfort of Trusting God in the Uncertainties of Life. Mark is married to Sarah, and they have three married sons, a college-aged daughter, and two grandchildren. You can find Mark on Facebook, Instagram, and X.

Share Page

Contact Form